IMCG vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIMCGIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.06%0.03%
AUM$4.0B$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.61%1.09%
Holdings265508
YTD Return+18.13%+9.93%
1Y Return+17.24%+19.59%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.83%+19.41%
5Y Return (annualized)+7.11%+12.89%
Volatility (annualized)17.9%15.1%
Max Drawdown-59.0%-56.5%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 28, 2004May 15, 2000

IMCG vs IVV Performance

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IMCG returned +17.24% while IVV returned +19.59%. Year to date, IMCG is up 18.13% versus a gain of 9.93% for IVV.

Over three years, IMCG compounded at +15.83% per year against +19.41% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.11% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, IMCG has the edge at +11.07% annualized vs +6.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IMCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.0% for IMCG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IMCG charges 0.06% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMCG currently yields 0.61% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

12.5%overlap

IMCG and IVV share 186 holdings out of 580 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IMCGWeight in IVVDifference
FTNT1.34%0.15%1.19%
CMI1.24%0.14%1.10%
HOOD1.21%0.13%1.08%
FCXProProPro
JCIProProPro
DELLProProPro
DDOGProProPro
AONProProPro
HLTProProPro
MCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings IMCG shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IMCG or IVV?

IMCG has an expense ratio of 0.06% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IMCG or IVV?

Over the past year IMCG returned +17.24% vs +19.59% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), IMCG annualized +11.07% vs +6.91% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IMCG or IVV?

IMCG has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IMCG -59.0% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both IMCG and IVV?

IMCG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IMCG and IVV?

IMCG and IVV share 186 common holdings with a 12.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 580 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IMCG or IVV?

IMCG yields 0.61% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →