HQGO vs VTI
HQGO vs VTI
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HQGO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $48M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.46% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 164 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.36% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.34% | +24.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -20.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 5, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
HQGO vs VTI Performance
Hartford US Quality Growth ETF (HQGO) is a ETF from Hartford Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HQGO returned +23.34% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, HQGO is up 13.36% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.0% for HQGO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.9% for HQGO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HQGO charges 0.34% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HQGO currently yields 0.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
HQGO and VTI share 147 holdings out of 2798 unique holdings combined, representing a 48.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HQGO | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 5.31% | 6.32% | 1.01% |
| AAPL | 5.72% | 5.84% | 0.12% |
| AMZN | 4.54% | 3.17% | 1.37% |
| MSFT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOGL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AVGO | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LLY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| JPM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings HQGO shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HQGO or VTI?
HQGO has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HQGO or VTI?
Over the past year HQGO returned +23.34% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), HQGO annualized +22.88% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HQGO or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.0% for HQGO. Worst drawdown: HQGO -20.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both HQGO and VTI?
HQGO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between HQGO and VTI?
HQGO and VTI share 147 common holdings with a 48.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2798 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HQGO or VTI?
HQGO yields 0.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.