HLAL vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. HLAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: HLALMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHLALVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%
AUM$906M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.45%1.07%
Holdings2093,543
YTD Return+17.96%+14.20%
1Y Return+33.31%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.14%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.25%+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)18.0%15.3%
Max Drawdown-33.6%-56.6%
Fund FamilyWahed InvestVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 15, 2019May 24, 2001

HLAL vs VTI Performance

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) is a ETF from Wahed Invest and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HLAL returned +33.31% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, HLAL is up 17.96% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, HLAL compounded at +20.14% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.25% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HLAL has the edge at +17.19% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

HLAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for HLAL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HLAL charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HLAL currently yields 0.45% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

46.8%overlap

HLAL and VTI share 190 holdings out of 2801 unique holdings combined, representing a 46.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HLALWeight in VTIDifference
AAPL13.35%5.84%7.51%
MSFT9.25%3.81%5.44%
GOOGL6.72%2.88%3.84%
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
LLYProProPro
AMDProProPro
See all 10 holdings HLAL shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HLAL or VTI?

HLAL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.

Which performed better, HLAL or VTI?

Over the past year HLAL returned +33.31% vs +24.16% for VTI, so HLAL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HLAL annualized +17.19% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, HLAL or VTI?

HLAL has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: HLAL -33.6% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both HLAL and VTI?

HLAL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between HLAL and VTI?

HLAL and VTI share 190 common holdings with a 46.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2801 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, HLAL or VTI?

HLAL yields 0.45% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →