HLAL vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. HLAL delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: HLALMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHLALIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%
AUM$906M$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.45%1.09%
Holdings209508
YTD Return+17.96%+13.80%
1Y Return+33.31%+23.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.14%+21.49%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.25%+13.43%
Volatility (annualized)18.0%15.1%
Max Drawdown-33.6%-56.5%
Fund FamilyWahed InvestiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 15, 2019May 15, 2000

HLAL vs IVV Performance

Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) is a ETF from Wahed Invest and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HLAL returned +33.31% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, HLAL is up 17.96% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.

Over three years, HLAL compounded at +20.14% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.25% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HLAL has the edge at +17.19% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

HLAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.6% for HLAL and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HLAL charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HLAL currently yields 0.45% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

51.7%overlap

HLAL and IVV share 187 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 51.7% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HLALWeight in IVVDifference
AAPL13.35%7.44%5.91%
MSFT9.25%4.57%4.68%
GOOGL6.72%3.15%3.57%
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
LLYProProPro
AMDProProPro
See all 10 holdings HLAL shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HLAL or IVV?

HLAL has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.

Which performed better, HLAL or IVV?

Over the past year HLAL returned +33.31% vs +23.70% for IVV, so HLAL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HLAL annualized +17.19% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, HLAL or IVV?

HLAL has been the more volatile fund at 18.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HLAL -33.6% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both HLAL and IVV?

HLAL and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between HLAL and IVV?

HLAL and IVV share 187 common holdings with a 51.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, HLAL or IVV?

HLAL yields 0.45% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →