FOPC vs VTI
FOPC vs VTI
Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FOPC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.87% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $33M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.21% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.45% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.58% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.3% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -2.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Frontier Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 19, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
FOPC vs VTI Performance
Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF (FOPC) is a ETF from Frontier Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FOPC returned +2.58% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, FOPC is up 0.45% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 2.3% for FOPC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.2% for FOPC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FOPC charges 0.87% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $87 vs $3 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FOPC currently yields 4.21% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FOPC and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FOPC or VTI?
FOPC has an expense ratio of 0.87% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $84 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FOPC or VTI?
Over the past year FOPC returned +2.58% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), FOPC annualized +4.20% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FOPC or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 2.3% for FOPC. Worst drawdown: FOPC -2.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FOPC and VTI?
FOPC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FOPC and VTI?
FOPC and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FOPC or VTI?
FOPC yields 4.21% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FOPC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.