FHYS vs VTI
FHYS vs VTI
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FHYS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $54M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.82% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 252 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.92% | +11.83% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.98% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.30% | +20.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
FHYS vs VTI Performance
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) is a ETF from Federated Hermes and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FHYS returned +4.98% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, FHYS is up 1.92% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.
Over three years, FHYS compounded at +7.30% per year against +20.40% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.06% annualized vs +4.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 4.6% for FHYS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.6% for FHYS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FHYS charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FHYS currently yields 5.82% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FHYS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2988 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FHYS or VTI?
FHYS has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FHYS or VTI?
Over the past year FHYS returned +4.98% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FHYS annualized +4.45% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FHYS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 4.6% for FHYS. Worst drawdown: FHYS -11.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FHYS and VTI?
FHYS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FHYS and VTI?
FHYS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2988 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FHYS or VTI?
FHYS yields 5.82% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FHYS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.