FHYS vs IVV
FHYS vs IVV
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FHYS | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $54M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.82% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 252 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +2.03% | +13.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.04% | +22.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.29% | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Federated Hermes | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
FHYS vs IVV Performance
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) is a ETF from Federated Hermes and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FHYS returned +5.04% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, FHYS is up 2.03% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.
Over three years, FHYS compounded at +7.29% per year against +21.08% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 4.6% for FHYS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.6% for FHYS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FHYS charges 0.50% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FHYS currently yields 5.82% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FHYS and IVV share 0 holdings out of 710 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FHYS or IVV?
FHYS has an expense ratio of 0.50% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FHYS or IVV?
Over the past year FHYS returned +5.04% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), FHYS annualized +4.46% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FHYS or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 4.6% for FHYS. Worst drawdown: FHYS -11.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FHYS and IVV?
FHYS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FHYS and IVV?
FHYS and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 710 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FHYS or IVV?
FHYS yields 5.82% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FHYS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.