FFSM vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. FFSM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: FFSMMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFFSMVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.43%0.03%
AUM$1.4B$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.43%1.07%
Holdings1943,543
YTD Return+19.32%+11.83%
1Y Return+34.91%+21.79%
3Y Return (annualized)+18.92%+20.40%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.72%+11.96%
Volatility (annualized)18.8%15.3%
Max Drawdown-26.6%-56.6%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 2, 2021May 24, 2001

FFSM vs VTI Performance

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFSM returned +34.91% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, FFSM is up 19.32% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.

Over three years, FFSM compounded at +18.92% per year against +20.40% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.72% and +11.96% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FFSM has the edge at +12.06% annualized vs +8.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FFSM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for FFSM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FFSM charges 0.43% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $3 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFSM currently yields 0.43% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

2.4%overlap

FFSM and VTI share 135 holdings out of 2838 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FFSMWeight in VTIDifference
LITE2.28%0.09%2.19%
0RMV:LN2.02%0.04%1.98%
FN1.73%0.03%1.70%
TPXProProPro
AEISProProPro
FIXProProPro
USFDProProPro
IESCProProPro
ATIProProPro
FCFSProProPro
See all 10 holdings FFSM shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FFSM or VTI?

FFSM has an expense ratio of 0.43% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FFSM or VTI?

Over the past year FFSM returned +34.91% vs +21.79% for VTI, so FFSM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FFSM annualized +12.06% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FFSM or VTI?

FFSM has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FFSM -26.6% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both FFSM and VTI?

FFSM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FFSM and VTI?

FFSM and VTI share 135 common holdings with a 2.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2838 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FFSM or VTI?

FFSM yields 0.43% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →