FFSM vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. FFSM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: FFSMMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFFSMIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.43%0.03%
AUM$1.4B$865.2B
Dividend Yield0.43%1.09%
Holdings194508
YTD Return+21.92%+13.52%
1Y Return+37.85%+23.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.51%+21.26%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.33%+13.52%
Volatility (annualized)18.8%15.1%
Max Drawdown-26.6%-56.5%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionFeb 2, 2021May 15, 2000

FFSM vs IVV Performance

Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFSM returned +37.85% while IVV returned +23.63%. Year to date, FFSM is up 21.92% versus a gain of 13.52% for IVV.

Over three years, FFSM compounded at +19.51% per year against +21.26% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.33% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FFSM has the edge at +12.49% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FFSM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.6% for FFSM and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FFSM charges 0.43% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $43 vs $3 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFSM currently yields 0.43% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

1.6%overlap

FFSM and IVV share 18 holdings out of 677 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FFSMWeight in IVVDifference
LITE2.28%0.10%2.18%
FIX1.47%0.10%1.37%
STX0.87%0.31%0.56%
COHRProProPro
EMEProProPro
WDCProProPro
UHSProProPro
VTRProProPro
TPRProProPro
PRProProPro
See all 10 holdings FFSM shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FFSM or IVV?

FFSM has an expense ratio of 0.43% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $40 per year of difference.

Which performed better, FFSM or IVV?

Over the past year FFSM returned +37.85% vs +23.63% for IVV, so FFSM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FFSM annualized +12.49% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, FFSM or IVV?

FFSM has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FFSM -26.6% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both FFSM and IVV?

FFSM and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between FFSM and IVV?

FFSM and IVV share 18 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 677 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, FFSM or IVV?

FFSM yields 0.43% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →