FFOX vs VTI
FFOX vs VTI
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOX | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $233M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 76 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +8.70% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.60% | +24.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.73% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | FundX Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
FFOX vs VTI Performance
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) is a ETF from FundX Funds and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FFOX returned +17.60% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, FFOX is up 8.70% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for FFOX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOX charges 1.02% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOX currently yields 1.63% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
FFOX and VTI share 54 holdings out of 2802 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOX | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HALO | 3.61% | 0.01% | 3.60% |
| GH | 2.53% | 0.03% | 2.50% |
| CRS | 2.06% | 0.04% | 2.02% |
| NTRA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GMED | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BWXT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| FCFS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| WMS | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MRCY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| SNEX | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings FFOX shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOX or VTI?
FFOX has an expense ratio of 1.02% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFOX or VTI?
Over the past year FFOX returned +17.60% vs +24.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FFOX annualized +18.11% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFOX or VTI?
FFOX has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FFOX -12.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both FFOX and VTI?
FFOX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOX and VTI?
FFOX and VTI share 54 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2802 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOX or VTI?
FFOX yields 1.63% while VTI yields 1.07%, so FFOX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.