FFOX vs IVV
FFOX vs IVV
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFOX | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.02% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $233M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.63% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 76 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +8.70% | +13.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.60% | +22.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | FundX Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 9, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
FFOX vs IVV Performance
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) is a ETF from FundX Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year FFOX returned +17.60% while IVV returned +22.90%. Year to date, FFOX is up 8.70% versus a gain of 13.13% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.4% for FFOX and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FFOX charges 1.02% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $102 vs $3 annually, a gap of $99 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FFOX currently yields 1.63% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
FFOX and IVV share 4 holdings out of 574 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FFOX | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CIEN | 1.47% | 0.09% | 1.38% |
| WYNN | 1.32% | 0.01% | 1.31% |
| NCLH | 1.31% | 0.01% | 1.30% |
| AXON | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 4 holdings FFOX shares with IVV Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FFOX or IVV?
FFOX has an expense ratio of 1.02% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $99 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FFOX or IVV?
Over the past year FFOX returned +17.60% vs +22.90% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), FFOX annualized +18.11% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FFOX or IVV?
FFOX has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: FFOX -12.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both FFOX and IVV?
FFOX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FFOX and IVV?
FFOX and IVV share 4 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 574 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FFOX or IVV?
FFOX yields 1.63% while IVV yields 1.09%, so FFOX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.