EURL vs VTI
EURL vs VTI
Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3X ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EURL delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EURL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.04% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $51M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +23.18% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +57.43% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +36.09% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.24% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 49.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -85.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
EURL vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3X ETF (EURL) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EURL returned +57.43% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, EURL is up 23.18% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, EURL compounded at +36.09% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.24% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +2.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EURL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 49.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -85.2% for EURL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EURL charges 1.04% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $104 vs $3 annually, a gap of $101 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EURL currently yields 1.59% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EURL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EURL or VTI?
EURL has an expense ratio of 1.04% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $101 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EURL or VTI?
Over the past year EURL returned +57.43% vs +24.16% for VTI, so EURL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), EURL annualized +2.94% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EURL or VTI?
EURL has been the more volatile fund at 49.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EURL -85.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EURL and VTI?
EURL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EURL and VTI?
EURL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EURL or VTI?
EURL yields 1.59% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EURL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.