CGGG vs VTI
CGGG vs VTI
Capital Group US Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $72M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.08% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.09% | +24.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
CGGG vs VTI Performance
Capital Group US Large Growth ETF (CGGG) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGGG returned +5.09% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, CGGG is up 2.08% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.8% for CGGG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGG charges 0.39% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $3 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGG currently yields 0.09% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CGGG and VTI share 40 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 10.76% | 6.32% | 4.44% |
| GOOG | 9.87% | 2.27% | 7.60% |
| AVGO | 8.86% | 2.46% | 6.40% |
| AAPL | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MSFT | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MU | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| APH | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings CGGG shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGG or VTI?
CGGG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGGG or VTI?
Over the past year CGGG returned +5.09% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CGGG annualized +11.46% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGGG or VTI?
CGGG has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: CGGG -17.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CGGG and VTI?
CGGG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGG and VTI?
CGGG and VTI share 40 common holdings with a 31.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGG or VTI?
CGGG yields 0.09% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.