CGGG vs VYM
CGGG vs VYM
Capital Group US Large Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGGG | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $72M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.09% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 43 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -2.13% | +13.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.57% | +23.76% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 24, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
CGGG vs VYM Performance
Capital Group US Large Growth ETF (CGGG) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGGG returned +0.57% while VYM returned +23.76%. Year to date, CGGG is down 2.13% versus a gain of 13.24% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.8% for CGGG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGGG charges 0.39% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $39 vs $4 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGGG currently yields 0.09% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
CGGG and VYM share 4 holdings out of 596 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGGG | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | 8.86% | 6.47% | 2.39% |
| FTAI | 2.00% | 0.14% | 1.86% |
| PR | 1.79% | 0.06% | 1.73% |
| YUM | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 4 holdings CGGG shares with VYM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGGG or VYM?
CGGG has an expense ratio of 0.39% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGGG or VYM?
Over the past year CGGG returned +0.57% vs +23.76% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), CGGG annualized +7.37% vs +6.96% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGGG or VYM?
CGGG has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: CGGG -17.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both CGGG and VYM?
CGGG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGGG and VYM?
CGGG and VYM share 4 common holdings with a 6.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 596 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGGG or VYM?
CGGG yields 0.09% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.