CGCP vs VTI
CGCP vs VTI
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8.4B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.12% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,462 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.21% | +13.92% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.79% | +24.07% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.18% | +20.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.47% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
CGCP vs VTI Performance
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGCP returned +2.79% while VTI returned +24.07%. Year to date, CGCP is up 0.21% versus a gain of 13.92% for VTI.
Over three years, CGCP compounded at +5.18% per year against +20.88% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.0% for CGCP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for CGCP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCP charges 0.34% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCP currently yields 5.12% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
CGCP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 3520 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCP or VTI?
CGCP has an expense ratio of 0.34% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGCP or VTI?
Over the past year CGCP returned +2.79% vs +24.07% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CGCP annualized +1.55% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGCP or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.0% for CGCP. Worst drawdown: CGCP -15.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both CGCP and VTI?
CGCP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCP and VTI?
CGCP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCP or VTI?
CGCP yields 5.12% while VTI yields 1.07%, so CGCP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.