CGCP vs IVV
CGCP vs IVV
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. CGCP offers more diversification with 737 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGCP | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.34% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $8.4B | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.12% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,462 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.21% | +13.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.79% | +23.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.18% | +21.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.52% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -15.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Capital Group (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 22, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
CGCP vs IVV Performance
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF (CGCP) is a ETF from Capital Group (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CGCP returned +2.79% while IVV returned +23.63%. Year to date, CGCP is up 0.21% versus a gain of 13.52% for IVV.
Over three years, CGCP compounded at +5.18% per year against +21.26% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +1.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.0% for CGCP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.1% for CGCP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGCP charges 0.34% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $34 vs $3 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGCP currently yields 5.12% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
CGCP and IVV share 0 holdings out of 1242 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGCP or IVV?
CGCP has an expense ratio of 0.34% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CGCP or IVV?
Over the past year CGCP returned +2.79% vs +23.63% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), CGCP annualized +1.55% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CGCP or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.0% for CGCP. Worst drawdown: CGCP -15.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both CGCP and IVV?
CGCP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CGCP and IVV?
CGCP and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1242 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGCP or IVV?
CGCP yields 5.12% while IVV yields 1.09%, so CGCP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.