CCOR vs VXUS
CCOR vs VXUS
Core Alternative ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CCOR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.29% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $28M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 45 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.23% | +13.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.24% | +28.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.02% | +18.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.49% | +9.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Core Alternative Capital | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 23, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
CCOR vs VXUS Performance
Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is a ETF from Core Alternative Capital and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCOR returned -0.24% while VXUS returned +28.53%. Year to date, CCOR is up 1.23% versus a gain of 13.65% for VXUS.
Over three years, CCOR compounded at -1.02% per year against +18.64% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -1.49% and +9.00% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.81% annualized vs +1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.7% for CCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for CCOR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CCOR charges 1.29% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $5 annually, a gap of $124 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 1.02% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
CCOR and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7898 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CCOR or VXUS?
CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.29% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $124 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CCOR or VXUS?
Over the past year CCOR returned -0.24% vs +28.53% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CCOR annualized +1.22% vs +4.81% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CCOR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.7% for CCOR. Worst drawdown: CCOR -23.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both CCOR and VXUS?
CCOR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CCOR and VXUS?
CCOR and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7898 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or VXUS?
CCOR yields 1.02% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.