CCOR vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCCORVOOWinner
Expense Ratio1.29%0.03%
AUM$28M$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.02%1.09%
Holdings45509
YTD Return+1.23%+13.31%
1Y Return-0.24%+24.01%
3Y Return (annualized)-1.02%+21.17%
5Y Return (annualized)-1.49%+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)7.7%14.1%
Max Drawdown-23.0%-34.3%
Fund FamilyCore Alternative CapitalVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionMay 23, 2017Sep 7, 2010

CCOR vs VOO Performance

Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is a ETF from Core Alternative Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CCOR returned -0.24% while VOO returned +24.01%. Year to date, CCOR is up 1.23% versus a gain of 13.31% for VOO.

Over three years, CCOR compounded at -1.02% per year against +21.17% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -1.49% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs +1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 7.7% for CCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for CCOR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CCOR charges 1.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 1.02% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

23.4%overlap

CCOR and VOO share 34 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CCORWeight in VOODifference
AAPL2.37%6.59%4.22%
GOOGL5.29%3.25%2.04%
MSFT3.18%4.30%1.12%
AMZNProProPro
JNJProProPro
XOMProProPro
MSProProPro
CVXProProPro
JPMProProPro
WMTProProPro
See all 10 holdings CCOR shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CCOR or VOO?

CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CCOR or VOO?

Over the past year CCOR returned -0.24% vs +24.01% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CCOR annualized +1.22% vs +13.55% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CCOR or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 7.7% for CCOR. Worst drawdown: CCOR -23.0% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both CCOR and VOO?

CCOR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CCOR and VOO?

CCOR and VOO share 34 common holdings with a 23.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or VOO?

CCOR yields 1.02% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →