CCOR vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: QQQ

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCCORQQQWinner
Expense Ratio1.29%0.18%
AUM$28M$455.8B
Dividend Yield1.02%0.41%
Holdings45108
YTD Return+1.23%+17.27%
1Y Return-0.24%+28.64%
3Y Return (annualized)-1.02%+24.88%
5Y Return (annualized)-1.49%+14.86%
Volatility (annualized)7.7%30.6%
Max Drawdown-23.0%-83.0%
Fund FamilyCore Alternative CapitalInvesco (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionMay 23, 2017Mar 10, 1999

CCOR vs QQQ Performance

Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is a ETF from Core Alternative Capital and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CCOR returned -0.24% while QQQ returned +28.64%. Year to date, CCOR is up 1.23% versus a gain of 17.27% for QQQ.

Over three years, CCOR compounded at -1.02% per year against +24.88% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -1.49% and +14.86% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 7.7% for CCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for CCOR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CCOR charges 1.29% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $18 annually, a gap of $111 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 1.02% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

17.6%overlap

CCOR and QQQ share 9 holdings out of 132 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CCORWeight in QQQDifference
AAPL2.37%7.46%5.09%
GOOGL5.29%3.29%2.00%
MSFT3.18%4.65%1.47%
AMZNProProPro
WMTProProPro
METAProProPro
AMGNProProPro
PAYXProProPro
ADBEProProPro
See all 9 holdings CCOR shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CCOR or QQQ?

CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.29% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $111 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CCOR or QQQ?

Over the past year CCOR returned -0.24% vs +28.64% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CCOR annualized +1.22% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CCOR or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 7.7% for CCOR. Worst drawdown: CCOR -23.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both CCOR and QQQ?

CCOR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CCOR and QQQ?

CCOR and QQQ share 9 common holdings with a 17.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 132 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or QQQ?

CCOR yields 1.02% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so CCOR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →