CCOR vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricCCORIVVWinner
Expense Ratio1.29%0.03%
AUM$28M$865.2B
Dividend Yield1.02%1.09%
Holdings45508
YTD Return+1.23%+13.31%
1Y Return-0.24%+24.00%
3Y Return (annualized)-1.02%+21.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-1.49%+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)7.7%15.1%
Max Drawdown-23.0%-56.5%
Fund FamilyCore Alternative CapitaliShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionMay 23, 2017May 15, 2000

CCOR vs IVV Performance

Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is a ETF from Core Alternative Capital and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CCOR returned -0.24% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, CCOR is up 1.23% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.

Over three years, CCOR compounded at -1.02% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -1.49% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.7% for CCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.0% for CCOR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.14. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

CCOR charges 1.29% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $129 vs $3 annually, a gap of $126 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CCOR currently yields 1.02% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

23.9%overlap

CCOR and IVV share 35 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 23.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in CCORWeight in IVVDifference
AAPL2.37%7.44%5.07%
GOOGL5.29%3.15%2.14%
MSFT3.18%4.57%1.39%
AMZNProProPro
JNJProProPro
XOMProProPro
MSProProPro
CVXProProPro
JPMProProPro
METAProProPro
See all 10 holdings CCOR shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, CCOR or IVV?

CCOR has an expense ratio of 1.29% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $126 per year of difference.

Which performed better, CCOR or IVV?

Over the past year CCOR returned -0.24% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), CCOR annualized +1.22% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, CCOR or IVV?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.7% for CCOR. Worst drawdown: CCOR -23.0% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both CCOR and IVV?

CCOR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.14, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between CCOR and IVV?

CCOR and IVV share 35 common holdings with a 23.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, CCOR or IVV?

CCOR yields 1.02% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →