BSL vs VTI
BSL vs VTI
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSL | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | - | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $174M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.07% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 354 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +0.70% | +13.39% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.06% | +23.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.46% | +20.65% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.66% | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | The Blackstone Group Inc | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 26, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
BSL vs VTI Performance
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund (BSL) is a ETF from The Blackstone Group Inc and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BSL returned -0.06% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, BSL is up 0.70% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.
Over three years, BSL compounded at +8.46% per year against +20.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +3.66% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +0.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.2% for BSL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.1% for BSL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Holdings Overlap
BSL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2880 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which performed better, BSL or VTI?
Over the past year BSL returned -0.06% vs +23.21% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BSL annualized +0.10% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSL or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.2% for BSL. Worst drawdown: BSL -57.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BSL and VTI?
BSL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSL and VTI?
BSL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2880 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSL or VTI?
BSL yields 8.07% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.