BBMC vs SCHD

Quick Verdict

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBMC offers more diversification with 456 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHDMore Diversified: BBMC

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBMCSCHDWinner
Expense Ratio0.07%0.06%
AUM$2.1B$103.7B
Dividend Yield1.31%3.31%
Holdings560104
YTD Return+18.66%+24.08%
1Y Return+30.24%+31.88%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.89%+14.92%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.10%+9.85%
Volatility (annualized)18.6%13.6%
Max Drawdown-30.1%-33.4%
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 14, 2020Oct 20, 2011

BBMC vs SCHD Performance

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BBMC returned +30.24% while SCHD returned +31.88%. Year to date, BBMC is up 18.66% versus a gain of 24.08% for SCHD.

Over three years, BBMC compounded at +17.89% per year against +14.92% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +9.10% and +9.85% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, BBMC has the edge at +17.69% annualized vs +11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BBMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.1% for BBMC and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BBMC charges 0.07% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $6 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBMC currently yields 1.31% against 3.31% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

2.8%overlap

BBMC and SCHD share 15 holdings out of 541 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BBMCWeight in SCHDDifference
BBY0.36%0.43%0.07%
DINO0.28%0.36%0.08%
FNF0.27%0.33%0.06%
APAProProPro
AFGProProPro
ORIProProPro
SWKSProProPro
COLBProProPro
BAHProProPro
ALVProProPro
See all 10 holdings BBMC shares with SCHD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BBMC or SCHD?

BBMC has an expense ratio of 0.07% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BBMC or SCHD?

Over the past year BBMC returned +30.24% vs +31.88% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BBMC annualized +17.69% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BBMC or SCHD?

BBMC has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: BBMC -30.1% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both BBMC and SCHD?

BBMC and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BBMC and SCHD?

BBMC and SCHD share 15 common holdings with a 2.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 541 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BBMC or SCHD?

BBMC yields 1.31% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →