BBMC vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. BBMC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: BBMCMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBMCVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.07%0.04%
AUM$2.1B$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.31%2.86%
Holdings560568
YTD Return+18.66%+15.57%
1Y Return+30.24%+25.99%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.89%+18.02%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.10%+12.71%
Volatility (annualized)18.6%14.6%
Max Drawdown-30.1%-58.8%
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 14, 2020Nov 10, 2006

BBMC vs VYM Performance

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBMC returned +30.24% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, BBMC is up 18.66% versus a gain of 15.57% for VYM.

Over three years, BBMC compounded at +17.89% per year against +18.02% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.10% and +12.71% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, BBMC has the edge at +17.69% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BBMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.1% for BBMC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BBMC charges 0.07% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $4 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBMC currently yields 1.31% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

5.7%overlap

BBMC and VYM share 135 holdings out of 879 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.7% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BBMCWeight in VYMDifference
Q0.63%0.12%0.51%
TPR0.61%0.14%0.47%
WSM0.56%0.11%0.45%
CHRWProProPro
FTAIProProPro
RSProProPro
VTRSProProPro
CFProProPro
OVVProProPro
BGProProPro
See all 10 holdings BBMC shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BBMC or VYM?

BBMC has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BBMC or VYM?

Over the past year BBMC returned +30.24% vs +25.99% for VYM, so BBMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BBMC annualized +17.69% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BBMC or VYM?

BBMC has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BBMC -30.1% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both BBMC and VYM?

BBMC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BBMC and VYM?

BBMC and VYM share 135 common holdings with a 5.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 879 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BBMC or VYM?

BBMC yields 1.31% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →