BBMC vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. BBMC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: BBMCMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBMCVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.07%0.03%
AUM$2.1B$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.31%1.09%
Holdings560509
YTD Return+16.42%+11.51%
1Y Return+27.78%+21.46%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.38%+20.86%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.52%+13.01%
Volatility (annualized)18.6%14.1%
Max Drawdown-30.1%-34.3%
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionApr 14, 2020Sep 7, 2010

BBMC vs VOO Performance

JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBMC returned +27.78% while VOO returned +21.46%. Year to date, BBMC is up 16.42% versus a gain of 11.51% for VOO.

Over three years, BBMC compounded at +17.38% per year against +20.86% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.52% and +13.01% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, BBMC has the edge at +17.35% annualized vs +13.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BBMC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.1% for BBMC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BBMC charges 0.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $7 vs $3 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBMC currently yields 1.31% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

1.5%overlap

BBMC and VOO share 74 holdings out of 887 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BBMCWeight in VOODifference
CASY0.70%0.05%0.65%
Q0.63%0.05%0.58%
TPR0.61%0.05%0.56%
WSMProProPro
CHRWProProPro
MRNAProProPro
VTRSProProPro
CFProProPro
AKAMProProPro
BBYProProPro
See all 10 holdings BBMC shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BBMC or VOO?

BBMC has an expense ratio of 0.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BBMC or VOO?

Over the past year BBMC returned +27.78% vs +21.46% for VOO, so BBMC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BBMC annualized +17.35% vs +13.44% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BBMC or VOO?

BBMC has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BBMC -30.1% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both BBMC and VOO?

BBMC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BBMC and VOO?

BBMC and VOO share 74 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 887 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BBMC or VOO?

BBMC yields 1.31% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BBMC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →