BBAG vs VTI
BBAG vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggregate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBAG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.20% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,791 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -1.44% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.92% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.56% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.58% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
BBAG vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBAG returned +0.92% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, BBAG is down 1.44% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, BBAG compounded at +3.56% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.58% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 5.7% for BBAG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for BBAG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBAG charges 0.03% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, BBAG currently yields 4.20% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BBAG and VTI share 1 holdings out of 4094 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBAG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBAG or VTI?
BBAG has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTI charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBAG or VTI?
Over the past year BBAG returned +0.92% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBAG annualized +0.87% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBAG or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 5.7% for BBAG. Worst drawdown: BBAG -19.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BBAG and VTI?
BBAG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBAG and VTI?
BBAG and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4094 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBAG or VTI?
BBAG yields 4.20% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BBAG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.