BBAG vs QQQ
BBAG vs QQQ
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggregate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
BBAG has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BBAG offers more diversification with 1312 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBAG | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.20% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 1,791 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -1.66% | +12.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.55% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.47% | +22.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.78% | +14.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BBAG vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BBAG returned +1.55% while QQQ returned +22.35%. Year to date, BBAG is down 1.66% versus a gain of 12.48% for QQQ.
Over three years, BBAG compounded at +3.47% per year against +22.30% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -0.78% and +14.24% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs +0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.7% for BBAG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for BBAG and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBAG charges 0.03% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBAG currently yields 4.20% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BBAG and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 1414 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBAG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDP | 0.05% | 0.19% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBAG or QQQ?
BBAG has an expense ratio of 0.03% while QQQ charges 0.18%. BBAG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBAG or QQQ?
Over the past year BBAG returned +1.55% vs +22.35% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBAG annualized +0.84% vs +12.91% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBAG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.7% for BBAG. Worst drawdown: BBAG -19.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BBAG and QQQ?
BBAG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBAG and QQQ?
BBAG and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1414 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBAG or QQQ?
BBAG yields 4.20% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BBAG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.