AUSF vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAUSFVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.27%0.04%
AUM$900M$79.0B
Dividend Yield2.75%2.86%
Holdings197568
YTD Return+12.65%+15.80%
1Y Return+19.80%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.50%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.52%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)17.3%14.6%
Max Drawdown-44.3%-58.8%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 24, 2018Nov 10, 2006

AUSF vs VYM Performance

Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF (AUSF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AUSF returned +19.80% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, AUSF is up 12.65% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, AUSF compounded at +19.50% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.52% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, AUSF has the edge at +11.48% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AUSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for AUSF and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AUSF charges 0.27% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $4 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUSF currently yields 2.75% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

22.1%overlap

AUSF and VYM share 115 holdings out of 639 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AUSFWeight in VYMDifference
JNJ1.49%2.62%1.13%
WMT1.33%2.44%1.11%
CSCO1.99%1.39%0.60%
VZProProPro
XOMProProPro
TProProPro
KOProProPro
MOProProPro
LMTProProPro
CMEProProPro
See all 10 holdings AUSF shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AUSF or VYM?

AUSF has an expense ratio of 0.27% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AUSF or VYM?

Over the past year AUSF returned +19.80% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AUSF annualized +11.48% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AUSF or VYM?

AUSF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AUSF -44.3% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both AUSF and VYM?

AUSF and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between AUSF and VYM?

AUSF and VYM share 115 common holdings with a 22.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 639 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AUSF or VYM?

AUSF yields 2.75% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →