AUSF vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. AUSF offers more diversification with 196 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: AUSF

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAUSFQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.27%0.18%
AUM$900M$455.8B
Dividend Yield2.75%0.41%
Holdings197108
YTD Return+12.65%+18.20%
1Y Return+19.80%+27.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.50%+25.54%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.52%+15.12%
Volatility (annualized)17.3%30.6%
Max Drawdown-44.3%-83.0%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 24, 2018Mar 10, 1999

AUSF vs QQQ Performance

Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF (AUSF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year AUSF returned +19.80% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, AUSF is up 12.65% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.

Over three years, AUSF compounded at +19.50% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.52% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.3% for AUSF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for AUSF and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AUSF charges 0.27% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $18 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUSF currently yields 2.75% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

9.8%overlap

AUSF and QQQ share 18 holdings out of 281 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AUSFWeight in QQQDifference
AAPL1.14%7.46%6.32%
MSFT1.55%4.65%3.10%
CSCO1.99%2.08%0.09%
WMTProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
GOOGProProPro
LIN:IEProProPro
COSTProProPro
TMUSProProPro
EAProProPro
See all 10 holdings AUSF shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AUSF or QQQ?

AUSF has an expense ratio of 0.27% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AUSF or QQQ?

Over the past year AUSF returned +19.80% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AUSF annualized +11.48% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AUSF or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.3% for AUSF. Worst drawdown: AUSF -44.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both AUSF and QQQ?

AUSF and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between AUSF and QQQ?

AUSF and QQQ share 18 common holdings with a 9.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 281 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AUSF or QQQ?

AUSF yields 2.75% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so AUSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →