AUSF vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAUSFIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.27%0.03%
AUM$900M$865.2B
Dividend Yield2.75%1.09%
Holdings197508
YTD Return+11.96%+13.31%
1Y Return+18.88%+24.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.18%+21.16%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.47%+13.34%
Volatility (annualized)17.3%15.1%
Max Drawdown-44.3%-56.5%
Fund FamilyGlobal X by mirae AssetiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 24, 2018May 15, 2000

AUSF vs IVV Performance

Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF (AUSF) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AUSF returned +18.88% while IVV returned +24.00%. Year to date, AUSF is up 11.96% versus a gain of 13.31% for IVV.

Over three years, AUSF compounded at +19.18% per year against +21.16% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.47% and +13.34% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, AUSF has the edge at +11.40% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AUSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.3% for AUSF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AUSF charges 0.27% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $27 vs $3 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AUSF currently yields 2.75% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

17.0%overlap

AUSF and IVV share 127 holdings out of 574 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AUSFWeight in IVVDifference
AAPL1.14%7.44%6.30%
MSFT1.55%4.57%3.02%
GOOGL0.08%3.15%3.07%
BRK.BProProPro
CSCOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
JNJProProPro
VZProProPro
TProProPro
WMTProProPro
See all 10 holdings AUSF shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AUSF or IVV?

AUSF has an expense ratio of 0.27% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AUSF or IVV?

Over the past year AUSF returned +18.88% vs +24.00% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), AUSF annualized +11.40% vs +7.03% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AUSF or IVV?

AUSF has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AUSF -44.3% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both AUSF and IVV?

AUSF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between AUSF and IVV?

AUSF and IVV share 127 common holdings with a 17.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 574 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AUSF or IVV?

AUSF yields 2.75% while IVV yields 1.09%, so AUSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →