URAA vs VTI
URAA vs VTI
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | URAA | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $30M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 12.30% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -28.45% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | -7.44% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 88.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -69.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 26, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
URAA vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X ETF (URAA) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year URAA returned -7.44% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, URAA is down 28.45% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URAA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 88.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.1% for URAA and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
URAA charges 1.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $130 vs $3 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, URAA currently yields 12.30% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
URAA and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, URAA or VTI?
URAA has an expense ratio of 1.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $127 per year of difference.
Which performed better, URAA or VTI?
Over the past year URAA returned -7.44% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), URAA annualized +6.66% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, URAA or VTI?
URAA has been the more volatile fund at 88.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: URAA -69.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both URAA and VTI?
URAA and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between URAA and VTI?
URAA and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, URAA or VTI?
URAA yields 12.30% while VTI yields 1.07%, so URAA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.