TFNS vs VTI
TFNS vs VTI
T. Rowe Price Financials ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TFNS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.44% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 347 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +6.21% | +10.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.39% | +19.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 11, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
TFNS vs VTI Performance
T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TFNS returned +14.39% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, TFNS is up 6.21% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 12.4% for TFNS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.0% for TFNS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TFNS charges 0.44% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
TFNS and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2944 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TFNS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VST | 0.04% | 0.07% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TFNS or VTI?
TFNS has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TFNS or VTI?
Over the past year TFNS returned +14.39% vs +19.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TFNS annualized +15.40% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TFNS or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 12.4% for TFNS. Worst drawdown: TFNS -14.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TFNS and VTI?
TFNS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TFNS and VTI?
TFNS and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2944 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.