ROM vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ROM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: ROMMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricROMVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%
AUM$1.1B$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.06%1.07%
Holdings903,543
YTD Return+56.59%+14.20%
1Y Return+81.90%+24.16%
3Y Return (annualized)+51.63%+21.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+22.92%+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)41.9%15.3%
Max Drawdown-83.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionJan 30, 2007May 24, 2001

ROM vs VTI Performance

ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ROM returned +81.90% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, ROM is up 56.59% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.

Over three years, ROM compounded at +51.63% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +22.92% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, ROM has the edge at +24.15% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ROM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.8% for ROM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ROM charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ROM currently yields 0.06% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

32.6%overlap

ROM and VTI share 65 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 32.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ROMWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA7.58%6.32%1.26%
AAPL7.35%5.84%1.51%
MSFT4.60%3.81%0.79%
AVGOProProPro
MUProProPro
AMDProProPro
INTCProProPro
AMATProProPro
LRCXProProPro
CSCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings ROM shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ROM or VTI?

ROM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ROM or VTI?

Over the past year ROM returned +81.90% vs +24.16% for VTI, so ROM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), ROM annualized +24.15% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ROM or VTI?

ROM has been the more volatile fund at 41.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ROM -83.8% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both ROM and VTI?

ROM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between ROM and VTI?

ROM and VTI share 65 common holdings with a 32.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ROM or VTI?

ROM yields 0.06% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →