RACK vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricRACKVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%
AUM$49M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.07%
Holdings503,543
YTD Return-11.18%+11.83%
1Y Return-11.18%+21.79%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.40%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.96%
Volatility (annualized)230991813.3%15.3%
Max Drawdown-100.0%-56.6%
Fund FamilyVanEckVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 1, 2026May 24, 2001

RACK vs VTI Performance

VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF (RACK) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RACK returned -11.18% while VTI returned +21.79%. Year to date, RACK is down 11.18% versus a gain of 11.83% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

RACK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 230991813.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for RACK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

RACK charges 0.50% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RACK currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

14.4%overlap

RACK and VTI share 36 holdings out of 2797 unique holdings combined, representing a 14.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in RACKWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA4.33%6.32%1.99%
AVGO4.32%2.46%1.86%
MU4.88%1.79%3.09%
APHProProPro
CEGProProPro
ETNProProPro
SNDKProProPro
AMDProProPro
ORCLProProPro
VRTProProPro
See all 10 holdings RACK shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, RACK or VTI?

RACK has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.

Which performed better, RACK or VTI?

Over the past year RACK returned -11.18% vs +21.79% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), RACK annualized +19.75% vs +8.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, RACK or VTI?

RACK has been the more volatile fund at 230991813.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: RACK -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both RACK and VTI?

RACK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between RACK and VTI?

RACK and VTI share 36 common holdings with a 14.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2797 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, RACK or VTI?

RACK yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →