QQQ vs WINN

Quick Verdict

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQMore Diversified: QQQ

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQWINNWinner
Expense Ratio0.18%0.57%
AUM$455.8B$1.1B
Dividend Yield0.41%0.00%
Holdings10870
YTD Return+18.34%+9.16%
1Y Return+28.94%+13.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+25.28%+21.96%
5Y Return (annualized)+15.22%-
Volatility (annualized)30.6%21.1%
Max Drawdown-83.0%-32.1%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Harbor Funds
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMar 10, 1999Feb 2, 2022

QQQ vs WINN Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is a ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year QQQ returned +28.94% while WINN returned +13.63%. Year to date, QQQ is up 18.34% versus a gain of 9.16% for WINN.

Over three years, QQQ compounded at +25.28% per year against +21.96% for WINN. Across the full 5-year window we track, WINN has the edge at +14.39% annualized vs +13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 21.1% for WINN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.0% for QQQ and -32.1% for WINN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while WINN charges 0.57%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $57 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.41% against 0.00% for WINN.

Holdings Overlap

52.5%overlap

QQQ and WINN share 35 holdings out of 142 unique holdings combined, representing a 52.5% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QQQWeight in WINNDifference
NVDA7.88%11.34%3.46%
AAPL7.46%8.18%0.72%
GOOGL3.29%7.89%4.60%
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AMDProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings QQQ shares with WINN
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or WINN?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while WINN charges 0.57%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QQQ or WINN?

Over the past year QQQ returned +28.94% vs +13.63% for WINN, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QQQ annualized +13.12% vs +14.39% for WINN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QQQ or WINN?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 21.1% for WINN. Worst drawdown: QQQ -83.0% vs WINN -32.1%.

Should I hold both QQQ and WINN?

QQQ and WINN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between QQQ and WINN?

QQQ and WINN share 35 common holdings with a 52.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 142 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or WINN?

QQQ yields 0.41% while WINN yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →