QMID vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQMIDVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.38%0.04%
AUM$2M$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.49%2.86%
Holdings125568
YTD Return+7.77%+15.80%
1Y Return+13.33%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)14.1%14.6%
Max Drawdown-23.6%-58.8%
Fund FamilyWisdomTree InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 25, 2024Nov 10, 2006

QMID vs VYM Performance

WisdomTree US MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QMID returned +13.33% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, QMID is up 7.77% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.1% for QMID. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QMID and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QMID charges 0.38% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $4 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QMID currently yields 0.49% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

0.6%overlap

QMID and VYM share 16 holdings out of 667 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QMIDWeight in VYMDifference
PR1.34%0.06%1.28%
EG1.20%0.06%1.14%
DKS1.14%0.06%1.08%
EVRProProPro
AMProProPro
FLSProProPro
OSKProProPro
BAHProProPro
FCFSProProPro
HLIProProPro
See all 10 holdings QMID shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QMID or VYM?

QMID has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $34 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QMID or VYM?

Over the past year QMID returned +13.33% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QMID annualized +9.55% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QMID or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.1% for QMID. Worst drawdown: QMID -23.6% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both QMID and VYM?

QMID and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between QMID and VYM?

QMID and VYM share 16 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 667 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QMID or VYM?

QMID yields 0.49% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →