QMID vs VXUS
QMID vs VXUS
WisdomTree US MidCap Quality Growth Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QMID | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.49% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 125 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +7.77% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.33% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 25, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
QMID vs VXUS Performance
WisdomTree US MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QMID returned +13.33% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, QMID is up 7.77% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.1% for QMID. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.6% for QMID and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QMID charges 0.38% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $5 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QMID currently yields 0.49% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
QMID and VXUS share 3 holdings out of 7983 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QMID or VXUS?
QMID has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, QMID or VXUS?
Over the past year QMID returned +13.33% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), QMID annualized +9.55% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, QMID or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.1% for QMID. Worst drawdown: QMID -23.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both QMID and VXUS?
QMID and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between QMID and VXUS?
QMID and VXUS share 3 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7983 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, QMID or VXUS?
QMID yields 0.49% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.