PSTR vs VTI
PSTR vs VTI
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSTR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $64M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.90% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 250 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.10% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.66% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | PeakShares LLC | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
PSTR vs VTI Performance
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF (PSTR) is a ETF from PeakShares LLC and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSTR returned +21.66% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, PSTR is up 13.10% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 7.8% for PSTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.7% for PSTR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSTR charges 1.07% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSTR currently yields 4.90% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
PSTR and VTI share 55 holdings out of 2813 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PSTR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 1.34% | 6.32% | 4.98% |
| AAPL | 0.74% | 5.84% | 5.10% |
| MSFT | 0.72% | 3.81% | 3.09% |
| MU | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMZN | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| GOOG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| META | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AMD | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| TSLA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| MRK | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings PSTR shares with VTI Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSTR or VTI?
PSTR has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSTR or VTI?
Over the past year PSTR returned +21.66% vs +24.16% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), PSTR annualized +17.99% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSTR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 7.8% for PSTR. Worst drawdown: PSTR -13.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PSTR and VTI?
PSTR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between PSTR and VTI?
PSTR and VTI share 55 common holdings with a 15.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2813 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSTR or VTI?
PSTR yields 4.90% while VTI yields 1.07%, so PSTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.