ONEO vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ONEO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: ONEOMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricONEOVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.20%0.03%
AUM$29M$663.5B
Dividend Yield1.18%1.07%
Holdings9063,543
YTD Return+17.90%+10.14%
1Y Return+24.78%+19.82%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.40%+18.94%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.55%+11.79%
Volatility (annualized)17.1%15.4%
Max Drawdown-41.2%-56.6%
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 1, 2015May 24, 2001

ONEO vs VTI Performance

State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Momentum Focus ETF (ONEO) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ONEO returned +24.78% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, ONEO is up 17.90% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.

Over three years, ONEO compounded at +16.40% per year against +18.94% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.55% and +11.79% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, ONEO has the edge at +10.01% annualized vs +7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ONEO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -41.2% for ONEO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ONEO charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ONEO currently yields 1.18% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

31.2%overlap

ONEO and VTI share 739 holdings out of 2943 unique holdings combined, representing a 31.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ONEOWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA0.20%6.32%6.12%
AAPL0.16%5.84%5.68%
MSFT0.10%3.81%3.71%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
MUProProPro
GOOGProProPro
WDCProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings ONEO shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ONEO or VTI?

ONEO has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, ONEO or VTI?

Over the past year ONEO returned +24.78% vs +19.82% for VTI, so ONEO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), ONEO annualized +10.01% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, ONEO or VTI?

ONEO has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ONEO -41.2% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both ONEO and VTI?

ONEO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between ONEO and VTI?

ONEO and VTI share 739 common holdings with a 31.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2943 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, ONEO or VTI?

ONEO yields 1.18% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ONEO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →