OMFL vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. OMFL offers more diversification with 571 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: OMFL

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricOMFLVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.29%0.03%
AUM$4.7B$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.81%1.09%
Holdings481509
YTD Return+15.40%+13.80%
1Y Return+22.09%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.35%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.64%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)17.4%14.1%
Max Drawdown-33.2%-34.3%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 8, 2017Sep 7, 2010

OMFL vs VOO Performance

Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OMFL returned +22.09% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, OMFL is up 15.40% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, OMFL compounded at +13.35% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.64% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, OMFL has the edge at +14.18% annualized vs +13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

OMFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.2% for OMFL and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

OMFL charges 0.29% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OMFL currently yields 0.81% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

63.6%overlap

OMFL and VOO share 372 holdings out of 704 unique holdings combined, representing a 63.6% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in OMFLWeight in VOODifference
AAPL7.85%6.59%1.26%
NVDA4.77%7.51%2.74%
MSFT4.85%4.30%0.55%
GOOGLProProPro
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
VProProPro
AVGOProProPro
LLYProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings OMFL shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, OMFL or VOO?

OMFL has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.

Which performed better, OMFL or VOO?

Over the past year OMFL returned +22.09% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), OMFL annualized +14.18% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, OMFL or VOO?

OMFL has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: OMFL -33.2% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both OMFL and VOO?

OMFL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between OMFL and VOO?

OMFL and VOO share 372 common holdings with a 63.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 704 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, OMFL or VOO?

OMFL yields 0.81% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →