IVV vs OMFL

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. OMFL offers more diversification with 571 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: OMFL

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVOMFLWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.29%
AUM$865.2B$4.7B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.81%
Holdings508481
YTD Return+13.52%+15.02%
1Y Return+23.63%+22.18%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.26%+13.08%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.52%+9.88%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%17.4%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-33.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Nov 8, 2017

IVV vs OMFL Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while OMFL returned +22.18%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 15.02% for OMFL.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.26% per year against +13.08% for OMFL; over five years the annualized figures are +13.52% and +9.88% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, OMFL has the edge at +14.16% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

OMFL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -33.2% for OMFL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while OMFL charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.81% for OMFL.

Holdings Overlap

63.1%overlap

IVV and OMFL share 369 holdings out of 707 unique holdings combined, representing a 63.1% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in OMFLDifference
AAPL7.44%7.85%0.41%
NVDA7.76%4.77%2.99%
MSFT4.57%4.85%0.28%
GOOGLProProPro
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AVGOProProPro
VProProPro
LLYProProPro
METAProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with OMFL
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or OMFL?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while OMFL charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or OMFL?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +22.18% for OMFL, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +14.16% for OMFL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or OMFL?

OMFL has been the more volatile fund at 17.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs OMFL -33.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and OMFL?

IVV and OMFL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and OMFL?

IVV and OMFL share 369 common holdings with a 63.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 707 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or OMFL?

IVV yields 1.09% while OMFL yields 0.81%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →