NULC vs SCHD

Quick Verdict

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. NULC offers more diversification with 137 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHDMore Diversified: NULC

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricNULCSCHDWinner
Expense Ratio0.21%0.06%
AUM$70M$103.7B
Dividend Yield0.91%3.31%
Holdings138104
YTD Return+16.77%+23.31%
1Y Return+23.69%+30.42%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.82%+14.66%
5Y Return (annualized)+10.76%+9.59%
Volatility (annualized)16.9%13.6%
Max Drawdown-34.9%-33.4%
Fund FamilyNuveenCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 3, 2019Oct 20, 2011

NULC vs SCHD Performance

Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) is a ETF from Nuveen and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year NULC returned +23.69% while SCHD returned +30.42%. Year to date, NULC is up 16.77% versus a gain of 23.31% for SCHD.

Over three years, NULC compounded at +19.82% per year against +14.66% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +10.76% and +9.59% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, NULC has the edge at +15.66% annualized vs +11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

NULC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.9% for NULC and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

NULC charges 0.21% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $21 vs $6 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NULC currently yields 0.91% against 3.31% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

9.8%overlap

NULC and SCHD share 13 holdings out of 224 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in NULCWeight in SCHDDifference
KO1.73%4.08%2.35%
PG1.62%4.15%2.53%
MRK1.40%4.32%2.92%
HDProProPro
AMGNProProPro
VZProProPro
ADPProProPro
2345:TWProProPro
CMCSAProProPro
OKEProProPro
See all 10 holdings NULC shares with SCHD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, NULC or SCHD?

NULC has an expense ratio of 0.21% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.

Which performed better, NULC or SCHD?

Over the past year NULC returned +23.69% vs +30.42% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), NULC annualized +15.66% vs +11.34% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, NULC or SCHD?

NULC has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: NULC -34.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both NULC and SCHD?

NULC and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between NULC and SCHD?

NULC and SCHD share 13 common holdings with a 9.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 224 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, NULC or SCHD?

NULC yields 0.91% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →