NBCM vs VTI
NBCM vs VTI
Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. NBCM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NBCM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $455M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.25% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 208 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +26.29% | +10.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +38.83% | +19.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.55% | +18.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.4% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Neuberger Berman | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
NBCM vs VTI Performance
Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) is a ETF from Neuberger Berman and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NBCM returned +38.83% while VTI returned +19.82%. Year to date, NBCM is up 26.29% versus a gain of 10.14% for VTI.
Over three years, NBCM compounded at +14.55% per year against +18.94% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, NBCM has the edge at +12.50% annualized vs +7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 13.4% for NBCM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for NBCM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NBCM charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NBCM currently yields 7.25% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
NBCM and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2870 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NBCM or VTI?
NBCM has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, NBCM or VTI?
Over the past year NBCM returned +38.83% vs +19.82% for VTI, so NBCM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), NBCM annualized +12.50% vs +7.99% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, NBCM or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 13.4% for NBCM. Worst drawdown: NBCM -14.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both NBCM and VTI?
NBCM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between NBCM and VTI?
NBCM and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2870 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, NBCM or VTI?
NBCM yields 7.25% while VTI yields 1.07%, so NBCM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.