MUSE vs SCHD
MUSE vs SCHD
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. MUSE offers more diversification with 144 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MUSE | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $40M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.67% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 260 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +2.23% | +24.08% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.06% | +31.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.92% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.85% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.9% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -3.6% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2024 | Oct 20, 2011 |
MUSE vs SCHD Performance
TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) is a ETF from TCW ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year MUSE returned +5.06% while SCHD returned +31.88%. Year to date, MUSE is up 2.23% versus a gain of 24.08% for SCHD.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 2.9% for MUSE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.6% for MUSE and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MUSE charges 0.56% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $56 vs $6 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MUSE currently yields 7.67% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
MUSE and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 244 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MUSE or SCHD?
MUSE has an expense ratio of 0.56% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $50 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MUSE or SCHD?
Over the past year MUSE returned +5.06% vs +31.88% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MUSE annualized +6.35% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MUSE or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 2.9% for MUSE. Worst drawdown: MUSE -3.6% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both MUSE and SCHD?
MUSE and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MUSE and SCHD?
MUSE and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 244 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MUSE or SCHD?
MUSE yields 7.67% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so MUSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.