IVV vs MUSE
IVV vs MUSE
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | MUSE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.56% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $40M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 7.67% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 260 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +2.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +5.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 2.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -3.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | TCW ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 15, 2024 |
IVV vs MUSE Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) is a ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while MUSE returned +5.37%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 2.43% for MUSE.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.9% for MUSE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -3.6% for MUSE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while MUSE charges 0.56%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $56 annually, a gap of $53 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 7.67% for MUSE.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and MUSE share 1 holdings out of 648 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in MUSE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNP | 0.04% | 0.64% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or MUSE?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MUSE charges 0.56%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $53 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or MUSE?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +5.37% for MUSE, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +6.45% for MUSE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or MUSE?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.9% for MUSE. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MUSE -3.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and MUSE?
IVV and MUSE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MUSE?
IVV and MUSE share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 648 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MUSE?
IVV yields 1.09% while MUSE yields 7.67%, so MUSE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.