MPRO vs VOO
MPRO vs VOO
Monarch ProCap Index ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MPRO | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.07% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $258M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.50% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 11 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.81% | +13.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.18% | +22.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.12% | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.31% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Monarch Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 23, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MPRO vs VOO Performance
Monarch ProCap Index ETF (MPRO) is a ETF from Monarch Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MPRO returned +9.18% while VOO returned +22.88%. Year to date, MPRO is up 5.81% versus a gain of 13.11% for VOO.
Over three years, MPRO compounded at +9.12% per year against +21.08% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.31% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.54% annualized vs +6.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.7% for MPRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.5% for MPRO and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MPRO charges 1.07% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $107 vs $3 annually, a gap of $104 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MPRO currently yields 1.50% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MPRO and VOO share 0 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MPRO or VOO?
MPRO has an expense ratio of 1.07% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $104 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MPRO or VOO?
Over the past year MPRO returned +9.18% vs +22.88% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MPRO annualized +6.34% vs +13.54% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MPRO or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.7% for MPRO. Worst drawdown: MPRO -14.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MPRO and VOO?
MPRO and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MPRO and VOO?
MPRO and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MPRO or VOO?
MPRO yields 1.50% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MPRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.