MMLG vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMMLGVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%
AUM$95M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.07%
Holdings753,543
YTD Return+5.70%+13.39%
1Y Return+15.59%+23.21%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.54%+20.65%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.42%+12.18%
Volatility (annualized)21.3%15.3%
Max Drawdown-46.0%-56.6%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 20, 2020May 24, 2001

MMLG vs VTI Performance

First Trust Multi-Manager Large Growth ETF (MMLG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MMLG returned +15.59% while VTI returned +23.21%. Year to date, MMLG is up 5.70% versus a gain of 13.39% for VTI.

Over three years, MMLG compounded at +21.54% per year against +20.65% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.42% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, MMLG has the edge at +11.29% annualized vs +8.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MMLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.3% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -46.0% for MMLG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MMLG charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MMLG currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

38.6%overlap

MMLG and VTI share 68 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 38.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MMLGWeight in VTIDifference
NVDA12.60%6.32%6.28%
AAPL4.14%5.84%1.70%
GOOGL6.30%2.88%3.42%
AMZNProProPro
MSFTProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
LLYProProPro
TSLAProProPro
NFLXProProPro
See all 10 holdings MMLG shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MMLG or VTI?

MMLG has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.

Which performed better, MMLG or VTI?

Over the past year MMLG returned +15.59% vs +23.21% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MMLG annualized +11.29% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, MMLG or VTI?

MMLG has been the more volatile fund at 21.3% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: MMLG -46.0% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both MMLG and VTI?

MMLG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between MMLG and VTI?

MMLG and VTI share 68 common holdings with a 38.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, MMLG or VTI?

MMLG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →