MIN vs VXUS
MIN vs VXUS
Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MIN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $297M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.84% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 219 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -2.37% | +13.57% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.92% | +28.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.63% | +18.63% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.42% | +9.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 17, 1988 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MIN vs VXUS Performance
Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund (MIN) is a ETF from Aberdeen Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MIN returned -1.92% while VXUS returned +28.78%. Year to date, MIN is down 2.37% versus a gain of 13.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, MIN compounded at +4.63% per year against +18.63% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +0.42% and +9.05% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.80% annualized vs -1.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.5% for MIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.9% for MIN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MIN charges 0.64% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $5 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIN currently yields 8.84% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MIN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8009 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MIN or VXUS?
MIN has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MIN or VXUS?
Over the past year MIN returned -1.92% vs +28.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MIN annualized -1.61% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MIN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.5% for MIN. Worst drawdown: MIN -57.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MIN and VXUS?
MIN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MIN and VXUS?
MIN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8009 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MIN or VXUS?
MIN yields 8.84% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so MIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.