MIN vs VOO
MIN vs VOO
Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MIN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.64% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $297M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.84% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 219 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -2.77% | +9.95% | |
| 1Y Return | -1.96% | +19.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.35% | +19.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.39% | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.5% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 17, 1988 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MIN vs VOO Performance
Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund (MIN) is a ETF from Aberdeen Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MIN returned -1.96% while VOO returned +19.58%. Year to date, MIN is down 2.77% versus a gain of 9.95% for VOO.
Over three years, MIN compounded at +4.35% per year against +19.43% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +0.39% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs -1.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.2% compared with 7.5% for MIN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.9% for MIN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.30. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MIN charges 0.64% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $64 vs $3 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIN currently yields 8.84% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MIN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 654 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MIN or VOO?
MIN has an expense ratio of 0.64% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MIN or VOO?
Over the past year MIN returned -1.96% vs +19.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MIN annualized -1.62% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MIN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.2% annualized versus 7.5% for MIN. Worst drawdown: MIN -57.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MIN and VOO?
MIN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.30, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MIN and VOO?
MIN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 654 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MIN or VOO?
MIN yields 8.84% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MIN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.