MIG vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMIGVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.20%0.04%
AUM$20M$79.0B
Dividend Yield4.76%2.86%
Holdings356568
YTD Return-2.60%+15.57%
1Y Return-0.86%+25.99%
3Y Return (annualized)+4.52%+18.02%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.28%+12.71%
Volatility (annualized)7.2%14.6%
Max Drawdown-21.0%-58.8%
Fund FamilyVanEckVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
InceptionDec 1, 2020Nov 10, 2006

MIG vs VYM Performance

VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MIG returned -0.86% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, MIG is down 2.60% versus a gain of 15.57% for VYM.

Over three years, MIG compounded at +4.52% per year against +18.02% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -0.28% and +12.71% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +0.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 7.2% for MIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.0% for MIG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MIG charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIG currently yields 4.76% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

2.2%overlap

MIG and VYM share 9 holdings out of 859 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MIGWeight in VYMDifference
KO0.49%1.39%0.90%
HD0.18%1.66%1.48%
PEP0.26%1.02%0.76%
TProProPro
MOProProPro
WMBProProPro
SYYProProPro
KDPProProPro
CAGProProPro
See all 9 holdings MIG shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MIG or VYM?

MIG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.

Which performed better, MIG or VYM?

Over the past year MIG returned -0.86% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), MIG annualized +0.24% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, MIG or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 7.2% for MIG. Worst drawdown: MIG -21.0% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both MIG and VYM?

MIG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between MIG and VYM?

MIG and VYM share 9 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 859 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, MIG or VYM?

MIG yields 4.76% while VYM yields 2.86%, so MIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →