IVV vs MIG

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVMIGWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.20%
AUM$865.2B$20M
Dividend Yield1.09%4.76%
Holdings508356
YTD Return+13.13%-2.65%
1Y Return+22.90%-1.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.08%+4.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.27%-0.13%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%7.2%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-21.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)VanEck
CategoryEquityFixed Income
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 1, 2020

IVV vs MIG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Moody's Analytics IG Corporate Bond ETF (MIG) is a ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% while MIG returned -1.00%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.13% versus a loss of 2.65% for MIG.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.08% per year against +4.50% for MIG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and -0.13% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +0.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.2% for MIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -21.0% for MIG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while MIG charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $20 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.76% for MIG.

Holdings Overlap

2.8%overlap

IVV and MIG share 12 holdings out of 803 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in MIGDifference
AAPL7.44%0.52%6.92%
KO0.49%0.49%0.00%
MA0.67%0.26%0.41%
HDProProPro
ORCLProProPro
MOProProPro
PEPProProPro
TProProPro
EQIXProProPro
WMBProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with MIG
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or MIG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while MIG charges 0.20%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or MIG?

Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% vs -1.00% for MIG, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +0.23% for MIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or MIG?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.2% for MIG. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs MIG -21.0%.

Should I hold both IVV and MIG?

IVV and MIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and MIG?

IVV and MIG share 12 common holdings with a 2.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 803 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or MIG?

IVV yields 1.09% while MIG yields 4.76%, so MIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →